The Battle for Sabarimala

Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India

We sell our titles through other companies
Disclaimer :You will be redirected to a third party website.The sole responsibility of supplies, condition of the product, availability of stock, date of delivery, mode of payment will be as promised by the said third party only. Prices and specifications may vary from the OUP India site.

ISBN:

9789391050139

Publication date:

31/03/2024

Hardback

272 pages

We sell our titles through other companies
Disclaimer :You will be redirected to a third party website.The sole responsibility of supplies, condition of the product, availability of stock, date of delivery, mode of payment will be as promised by the said third party only. Prices and specifications may vary from the OUP India site.

ISBN:

9789391050139

Publication date:

31/03/2024

Hardback

272 pages

Deepa Das Acevedo

The Battle for Sabarimala tells the story of one of contemporary India's most contentious disputes—a long running struggle over women's access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. 

Rights:  World Rights

Deepa Das Acevedo

Description

The Battle for Sabarimala tells the story of one of contemporary India's most contentious disputes—a long running struggle over women's access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. In 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the temple, which had traditionally excluded women aged ten to fifty because their presence offended the presiding deity, had to open its doors to all Hindus. The decision in Indian Young Lawyers Association (IYLA) rocked the nation. Protests were launched around India, and throughout the diaspora, a record-setting human chain called the 'Women's Wall' was coordinated, and dozens of petitions were filed asking the Supreme Court to reverse its landmark opinion. Most significantly, the IYLA opinion led the Court to openly reconsider the Essential Practices Doctrine that has been a mainstay of Indian religious freedom jurisprudence since 1954.

In this monograph-length study of the dispute, legal anthropologist Deepa Das Acevedo draws on ethnographic fieldwork, legal analysis, and media archives to tell a multifaceted narrative about the 'ban on women'. Reaching as far back as the eighteenth century, when the relationship between temple deities and the government was transformed by an ambitious precolonial ruler, and coming up to the litigation delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Das Acevedo reveals the complexities of the dispute and the constitutional framework that defines it. That framework, Das Acevedo argues, reflects two distinct conceptions of religion-state relations, both of which have emerged at various stages in the—still unresolved—battle for Sabarimala.

About the author:

Deepa Das Acevedo is an Associate Professor at Emory University School of Law and a Trustee (Class of '24) of the Law and Society Association. She received her JD and PhD in Anthropology from the University of Chicago. Her scholarly writing on India has appeared in journals including American Journal of Comparative Law, Modern Asian Studies, and International Journal of Constitutional Law, while her public writing has appeared in Economic & Political Weekly, Scroll, and Foreign Affairs, among others.

Deepa Das Acevedo

Table of contents

Preface
Note on Non-English Terms
Acronyms
Chronology
Copyright Permissions
Supreme Court Benches
Introduction
1. The Setting
2. The Counterprotests
3. The Case
4. The Scandal
5. The Rule
6. The Protests
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Appendix A: A Note on Interdisciplinary Interventions
Appendix B: Legal Materials
Notes
Bibliography
Index

Deepa Das Acevedo

Deepa Das Acevedo

Deepa Das Acevedo

Description

The Battle for Sabarimala tells the story of one of contemporary India's most contentious disputes—a long running struggle over women's access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. In 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the temple, which had traditionally excluded women aged ten to fifty because their presence offended the presiding deity, had to open its doors to all Hindus. The decision in Indian Young Lawyers Association (IYLA) rocked the nation. Protests were launched around India, and throughout the diaspora, a record-setting human chain called the 'Women's Wall' was coordinated, and dozens of petitions were filed asking the Supreme Court to reverse its landmark opinion. Most significantly, the IYLA opinion led the Court to openly reconsider the Essential Practices Doctrine that has been a mainstay of Indian religious freedom jurisprudence since 1954.

In this monograph-length study of the dispute, legal anthropologist Deepa Das Acevedo draws on ethnographic fieldwork, legal analysis, and media archives to tell a multifaceted narrative about the 'ban on women'. Reaching as far back as the eighteenth century, when the relationship between temple deities and the government was transformed by an ambitious precolonial ruler, and coming up to the litigation delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Das Acevedo reveals the complexities of the dispute and the constitutional framework that defines it. That framework, Das Acevedo argues, reflects two distinct conceptions of religion-state relations, both of which have emerged at various stages in the—still unresolved—battle for Sabarimala.

About the author:

Deepa Das Acevedo is an Associate Professor at Emory University School of Law and a Trustee (Class of '24) of the Law and Society Association. She received her JD and PhD in Anthropology from the University of Chicago. Her scholarly writing on India has appeared in journals including American Journal of Comparative Law, Modern Asian Studies, and International Journal of Constitutional Law, while her public writing has appeared in Economic & Political Weekly, Scroll, and Foreign Affairs, among others.

Read More

Table of contents

Preface
Note on Non-English Terms
Acronyms
Chronology
Copyright Permissions
Supreme Court Benches
Introduction
1. The Setting
2. The Counterprotests
3. The Case
4. The Scandal
5. The Rule
6. The Protests
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Appendix A: A Note on Interdisciplinary Interventions
Appendix B: Legal Materials
Notes
Bibliography
Index

Read More